5 rare Reasons Lack of Social-Media Profile Could Prompt

Photo of author

Lack of Social-Media Profile

(Bloomberg) — Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Friday ordered more scrutiny Lack of Social-Media Profile of any foreigners seeking to visit Harvard University, telling US consular officers that applicants’ lack of an online presence might be enough evidence to deny a visa.

Rubio’s cable, sent to embassies worldwide, marked the latest salvo by the Trump administration against Harvard, the foreign students who go there and elite universities more broadly. Rubio said the procedure spelled out in the document would serve as a pilot for the future days after he halted interviews for student visas to consider ways to weed out applicants deemed to pose possible risks to US national security.

The Friday cable ordered the new vetting procedures for all foreigners who want to visit Harvard, including “prospective students, students, faculty, employees, contractors, guest speakers, and tourists.” The Trump administration had earlier sought to bar Harvard from accepting any foreign students — a decision that was blocked by the courts.

The cable orders consular offers to scrutinize Lack of Social-Media Profile of potential applicants and order them to switch their social media accounts to public so interviewers can see what’s in them. The absence of online posts could be used against them, Rubio said.

“Consular officers should consider whether the lack of any online presence, or having social media accounts restricted to ‘private’ or with limited visibility, may be reflective of evasiveness,” the secretary added.

Reuters reported the existence of the latest cable earlier Friday.

The State Department declined to comment on Friday. Lack of Social-Media Profile It was the latest broadside in an ongoing clash between the White House and Harvard that has morphed into a larger attack over the role of US higher education. The campaign has alarmed lawyers and free-speech advocates, who argue that Rubio’s attack on people’s views may violate their rights.

“It seems a little bit like a damned if you do, damned if you don’t situation,” said Greg Lukianoff, president and chief executive officer of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, which defends freedom of speech on college campuses.

He wrote an article published Friday in the Atlantic that described the administration’s actions against Harvard as “egregious and unconstitutional.”

“I hadn’t actually thought about the idea that if you post on social media and you say things the government doesn’t like, you can be in trouble — but also if you conspicuously don’t or try to keep them private you can also be in trouble,” he said.

Sofia Cope, a staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said penalizing a would-be foreign student or visitor for not being active on social media or keeping their online presence shielded from the general public is an outrageous overreach by the administration.

International students accounted for 5.9% of the total US higher education population of almost 19 million. In the 2023-2024 school year, more than 1.1 million foreign students came to the US, with India sending the most, followed by China.

Vetting foreign students for visas is already a rigorous process, requiring applicants to prove strong academic credentials, financial means, ties to their own country and the intent to return home after graduation, according to David Leopold, a Cleveland-based immigration lawyer.

–With assistance from Andrew Martin and Alicia A. Caldwell.

More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com

Source link

Leave a Comment